Do the Mullahs Already Have The Bomb?
Some think so:
I don't think they do. We are quite sophisticated at detecting bomb tests. If the Iranians had one, they'd need to test it to know it works. If they did, you can bet we'd know about it, and do something about it.
We're not Hans Blix. We don't mess around when it comes to identifying nuclear threats, nor hide like a coward when we uncover them. This isn't the Clinton Administration. It isn't September 10th, 2001.
The best indication we have that the mullahs lack nuclear weapons is that we haven't wiped them from the face of the earth.
Bush and company know that the Iranians are not rational. They will not allow them to develop nuclear capability, and should our Russian, Chinese, or Pakistani "allies" aid and abet their program, you can bet nuclear engineers will start turning up missing or dead in those countries.
This isn't "24", but you can bet that the closest Dubya will ever get to being Jack Bauer will be over this issue.
EITAN, CURRENTLY a private businessman who is close to 80 years old, is not only still sharp, quick and curious, but also takes a strong interest in the dangers posed to Israel. And so he came this week to the Herzliya Conference to hear the lectures and meet with colleagues from other countries.
Eitan told me: "I am convinced that the Iranians already have at least one or two nuclear devices. They have been operating centrifuges for a number of years now, they have natural uranium, and who on earth believes the Iranians when they say that they have closed down one facility or another? You would have to be an idiot or terribly na ve to believe them."
Eitan says that this view was bolstered by conversations he held with various experts from abroad who came to the Herzliya Conference - that Iran already has a an atom bomb. What should concern not only Israel but Europe too, continues Eitan, is the fact that the Iranians have acquired cruise missiles with a 3,000-kilometer range. They tried to purchase nine missiles of this kind in Ukraine from the arsenal of the former Soviet Union, but Russia thwarted part of the deal and Iran received three or four such missiles.
"In an argument with colleagues from abroad," noted Rafi Eitan, "the question was whether Iran's current president is a sort of new Hitler or merely an international manipulator. Too many experts have judged him in accordance with his actions and declarations as a kind of extremist Islamist Hitler."
The American administration of George W. Bush is entirely aware of the burgeoning Iranian nuclear danger. The question is whether the leading countries in Europe will wake up in time to the danger too. "The diplomatic struggle against the Iranian nuclear danger," warns Eitan, "must be an international one and it must come in time. The danger of nuclear weapons in the hands of Teheran is no less serious than when Saddam Hussein built the French Osirak nuclear reactor in Baghdad."
What worries Rafi Eitan is that the news coming from Teheran shows that President Ahmadinejad will not hesitate to take the most extreme measures, not unlike the methods used in the Third Reich, to put down any opposition against him. Iran has hundreds of thousands of young people who are opposed to the conceptual and cultural darkness that the fundamental Islamists are forcing on them. "Don't be surprised," Rafi Eitan told me, "if the Iranian president tries to forcibly and brutally eliminate this opposition."
I don't think they do. We are quite sophisticated at detecting bomb tests. If the Iranians had one, they'd need to test it to know it works. If they did, you can bet we'd know about it, and do something about it.
We're not Hans Blix. We don't mess around when it comes to identifying nuclear threats, nor hide like a coward when we uncover them. This isn't the Clinton Administration. It isn't September 10th, 2001.
The best indication we have that the mullahs lack nuclear weapons is that we haven't wiped them from the face of the earth.
Bush and company know that the Iranians are not rational. They will not allow them to develop nuclear capability, and should our Russian, Chinese, or Pakistani "allies" aid and abet their program, you can bet nuclear engineers will start turning up missing or dead in those countries.
This isn't "24", but you can bet that the closest Dubya will ever get to being Jack Bauer will be over this issue.
1 Comments:
Teflon, our President did not seem very concerned about Iran as a nuclear threat other than to itself. He did express a concern, however, if thinking citizens of Iran continue to tolerate their oppressive leaders.
You are on target about mullahs with nukes. The world should not be shocked when they blow themselves and 1/6 of Iran to radioactive dust. Very bad accidents will happen in scenarios like present day Iran. Persia on their present track will again decline, as Allah has willed repeatedly.
Post a Comment
<< Home