That Strange Silence on the Left
Next up: global COOLING.
Labels: Global Warming, Hoaxes, Left Wing Media, Lefties
Labels: Global Warming, Hoaxes, Left Wing Media, Lefties
After the meeting was canceled, Kennedy wrote a public letter to the bishop that asserted, among other things, “The fact that I disagree with the hierarchy on some issues does not make me any less of a Catholic.” That claim solicited a response from Bishop Tobin, in which he focused on what it really means to be a Catholic, not just in name but in practice. Because he hoped that his words “might be instructive to other Catholics, including those in prominent positions of leadership,” he released the letter publicly.
The bishop of Providence began by responding to Kennedy’s statement that his disagreement with some aspects of the Catholic faith does not make him less Catholic. “That sentence certainly caught my attention,” Bishop Tobin said, “and deserves a public response, lest in go unchallenged and lead others to believe that it’s true.”
Disagreement with the hierarchy on some issues does make someone less of a Catholic, Bishop Tobin clarified, because “when someone rejects the teachings of the Church, especially on a grave matter, a life-and-death issue like abortion, it certainly does diminish their ecclesial communion, their unity with the Church.” After quoting Canon Law, the Catechism, and a Vatican document on Catholics in political life to emphasize that Catholics are called to live in accord with, and not prescind from, the social and moral teaching of the Church,” he continued, “There’s lots of canonical and theological verbiage there, Congressman, but what it means is that if you don’t accept the teachings of the Church your communion with the Church is flawed, or in your own words, makes you ‘less of a Catholic.’”
Since “being a Catholic has to mean something,” Bishop Tobin said that it minimally signifies “that you’re part of a faith community that possesses a clearly defined authority and doctrine, obligations and expectations. It means that you believe and accept the teachings of the Church, especially on essential matters of faith and morals; that you belong to a local Catholic community, a parish; that you attend Mass on Sundays and receive the sacraments regularly; that you support the Church, personally, publicly, spiritually and financially.” After calling on Congressman Kennedy to affirm that he lives by these “basic requirements,” he adds that if he doesn’t follow them, “What is it exactly that makes you a Catholic? Your baptism as an infant? Your family ties? Your cultural heritage?,” with the implication being that there clearly is a difference between a Catholic who lives according to his baptismal promises and one who doesn’t. The latter is, to use the Congressman’s expression, “less of a Catholic.”
Bishop Tobin noted that Congressman Kennedy’s “rejection of the Church’s teaching on abortion” is not a light matter, but a “deliberate and obstinate act of the will, a conscious decision you’ve reaffirmed on many occasions” that is “unacceptable to the Church and scandalous to many of our members. It absolutely diminishes your communion with the Church.” Support for abortion, in other words, does make one less of a Catholic.
He concluded his letter by inviting Congressman Kennedy, “as your bishop and brother in Christ, to enter into a sincere process of discernment, conversion and repentance,” offering his help to that end and reminding him that “it’s not too late for you to repair your relationship with the Church, redeem your public image, and emerge as an authentic ‘profile in courage,’ especially by defending the sanctity of human life for all people, including unborn children.”
Let us pray that Congressman Kennedy, and many other pro-choice Catholic politicians, respond to this instruction and invitation by becoming valuing their Catholic faith more than they do the abortion lobby.
Labels: Abortion, Catholicism, Religion
Labels: Euthanasia, Healthcare
Labels: Demographics, Healthcare, Socialism
But, at least on this first look, it appears that the three scandals are:
•First, a real attempt by a small group of scientists to subvert the peer-review process and suppress dissenting voices. (For another look at this, by a respected climate scientist who was one of the targets, see these posts on Roger Pielke Sr.’s blog.) This is at best massively unethical.
•Second, a willingness to manipulate the data to make a political case. This is certainly misconduct and possibly scientific fraud. This, if it proves true, should make these scientists subject to strong disciplinary action, even termination of their tenured positions.
•Third, what gives every appearance of an actual conspiracy to prevent data from being released as required by the Freedom of Information Acts in the US and UK. If this is proven true, that is a federal crime.
Labels: Crime, Global Warming, Hoaxes
Labels: Global Warming, Hoaxes
Labels: Global Warming, Hoaxes
Labels: Stupidity, War on Terror
Labels: Stupidity, War on Terror
Labels: Global Warming, Hoaxes, Lefties
Labels: Crime, War on Terror
There is a reason why our liberal friends have gotten into this mess of hypocrisy. The reason is the narrowness of their liberal narrative. Liberals exist to rescue those excluded from the country clubs of capitalism. You see, even though nobody would ever want to belong to a WASP country club, the fact that the WASPs don't immediately invite everyone to join is intolerable. Indeed, ever since the dawn of time dead white male bourgeois capitalists and their running dogs at Fox News and talk radio have been excluding workers, minorities, women, and gays from full membership in society. But fortunately there are kindly people, once called liberals and now progressives, who are determined to bring in an era of full inclusion for these traditionally marginalized groups. Liberals propose gentle and nuanced progressive legislation to include the excluded groups into the mainstream of society.
The problem with this philosophy sits right at the heart of it. Government is force. Politics is conflict. President Obama's program of progressive health care is a program of force. Most Americans will be forced to buy government-approved health insurance or face criminal penalty. To create support for the program he and his supporters demonize the opponents of the program as greedy insurance companies or greedy drug companies. In other words, they divide the world into "Us" and "Them." If you don't support the president you are the "Other."
Liberals can't really believe in inclusion when they believe that government is the answer and politics is the way.
Labels: Fascism, Philosophy, Socialism
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home