Why The Religious Left Embraces Environmentalism
WordGirl wondered why the United Methodist Church decided to preach "Clean and Green" from the pulpit rather than "Go and sin no more"----now we have the answer:
Not likely. After giving money to Democrats, NARAL, Emily's List, moveon.org, and Earth First!, I suspect Lefties won't have much left over to support churches. Moreover, with Sundays being a great day for lying around the State House lawn in Che Guevara regalia, I doubt they'll find the time to attend church anyway.
Not that that stops liberal clergy from hoping, mind you.
ON THE RELIGIOUS LEFT, the great hope these days is that the Religious Right is melting down over Global Warming. Liberal evangelical activist Jim Wallis rejoiced about the crack-up in a recent column, claiming that "the Religious Right is losing control" thanks to environmentalist evangelicals. Wallis, head of "Sojourners" and author of God's Politics: Why the American Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Just Does Not Get It, is predicting a "sea change" among evangelicals since the Religious Right has "now lost control of the environmental issue."
The reason for Wallis's optimism is the newly-created Evangelical Climate Initiative (ECI), endorsed by 86 religious leaders, which declared early this year that "human-induced climate change is real" and which urged legislation limiting carbon dioxide emissions. Those endorsing the ECI were mostly academics from evangelical colleges, with the notable exception of mega-church pastor and best-selling author Rick Warren. The New York Times and other media outlets lavished much attention on ECI's stance.
Absent from the ECI endorsement was the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) and its long-time Washington representative, Richard Cizik. An enthusiast for environmental causes, Cizik is prominently included in Vanity Fair's May 2006 "Green Issue," which features the cover-line, "A Graver Threat than Terrorism: Global Warming." Inside is a full-page shot of Cizik, clad in clerical black and walking barefoot across the water, back-dropped by an apocalyptic and no doubt very hot landscape.
Vanity Fair reports that Cizik often cites Revelation 11:18's ostensible warning that God will "destroy those
who destroy the earth." "Amen to that," Vanity Fair concludes.
WHY HAS THE ECI GOTTEN SO MUCH PLAY? Evangelicals have become the Republican party's largest and most reliable voting constituency, thanks in large part to concerns about abortion and homosexuality. If environmental issues can divide these voters, it might spell doom for the Republican coalition.
So Jim Wallis is excited. "The Evangelical Climate Initiative is of enormous importance and could be a tipping point in the climate change debate, according to one secular environmental leader I talked to," he writes. Concern about the environment, he hopes, will lead to an evangelical embrace other issues of the Left.
Not likely. After giving money to Democrats, NARAL, Emily's List, moveon.org, and Earth First!, I suspect Lefties won't have much left over to support churches. Moreover, with Sundays being a great day for lying around the State House lawn in Che Guevara regalia, I doubt they'll find the time to attend church anyway.
Not that that stops liberal clergy from hoping, mind you.
1 Comments:
If true, and it certainly appears to be,this shows the Left is capable of linear, multiple- step thinking, at least when plotting its diabolical ascendancy.
It also tends to demonstrate, however, that the Left cannot risk exposing its core tenets to public debate in a competitive forum.
A very arrogant and heavy-handed lot these lawyers.
Post a Comment
<< Home