Another Left-Wing Crisis That Isn't
Relax, parents---reports of campus rape are wildly overstated thanks to feminists' need to demonize young males:
The way the "1 in 4" number gets trumpeted, you'd think the Left Wing Media, you know, was in bed with the feminists or something.
Look, rape is about the worst thing that can happen to somebody. It shouldn't be trivialized by conflating it with the drunken hookup culture which pervades campuses, and which is also in large part a product of feminism. Young women get told how empowering sex is, get loaded to get over their inhibitions and do what the feminists tell them to, and wake up to find the experience to be degrading and not wonderful in the least. Awful, but not rape.
Of course, you won't see feminists advising combatting the potential for campus rape by imposing curfews, eliminating coed dorms, and restoring a sense of female propriety.
The problem's not THAT bad, right?
One more thing: if those evil male college students are preying on young feminists to the tune of 25%, wouldn't one expect homosexual rape to be even more prevalent on campus? I mean, the hookup culture is more pronounced among the male gay community, particularly young males, right? That would have to translate into more opportunities for such crimes to be committed, yet I don't see such claims being made outside of penal institutions, where the Left doesn't seem to much care about stopping it.
Curiouser and curiouser, the cracked lens of the modern leftist.
The campus rape industry’s central tenet is that one-quarter of all college girls will be raped or be the targets of attempted rape by the end of their college years (completed rapes outnumbering attempted rapes by a ratio of about three to two). The girls’ assailants are not terrifying strangers grabbing them in dark alleys but the guys sitting next to them in class or at the cafeteria.
This claim, first published in Ms. magazine in 1987, took the universities by storm. By the early 1990s, campus rape centers and 24-hour hotlines were opening across the country, aided by tens of millions of dollars of federal funding. Victimhood rituals sprang up: first the Take Back the Night rallies, in which alleged rape victims reveal their stories to gathered crowds of candle-holding supporters; then the Clothesline Project, in which T-shirts made by self-proclaimed rape survivors are strung on campus, while recorded sounds of gongs and drums mark minute-by-minute casualties of the “rape culture.” A special rhetoric emerged: victims’ family and friends were “co-survivors”; “survivors” existed in a larger “community of survivors.”
An army of salesmen took to the road, selling advice to administrators on how to structure sexual-assault procedures, and lecturing freshmen on the “undetected rapists” in their midst. Rape bureaucrats exchanged notes at such gatherings as the Inter Ivy Sexual Assault Conferences and the New England College Sexual Assault Network. Organizations like One in Four and Men Can Stop Rape tried to persuade college boys to redefine their masculinity away from the “rape culture.” The college rape infrastructure shows no signs of a slowdown. In 2006, for example, Yale created a new Sexual Harassment and Assault Resources and Education Center, despite numerous resources for rape victims already on campus.
If the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely. The nation’s nearly 10 million female undergrads would need to take the most stringent safety precautions. Certainly, they would have to alter their sexual behavior radically to avoid falling prey to the rape epidemic.
None of this crisis response occurs, of course—because the crisis doesn’t exist. During the 1980s, feminist researchers committed to the rape-culture theory had discovered that asking women directly if they had been raped yielded disappointing results—very few women said that they had been. So Ms. commissioned University of Arizona public health professor Mary Koss to develop a different way of measuring the prevalence of rape. Rather than asking female students about rape per se, Koss asked them if they had experienced actions that she then classified as rape. Koss’s method produced the 25 percent rate, which Ms. then published.
Koss’s study had serious flaws. Her survey instrument was highly ambiguous, as University of California at Berkeley social-welfare professor Neil Gilbert has pointed out. But the most powerful refutation of Koss’s research came from her own subjects: 73 percent of the women whom she characterized as rape victims said that they hadn’t been raped. Further—though it is inconceivable that a raped woman would voluntarily have sex again with the fiend who attacked her—42 percent of Koss’s supposed victims had intercourse again with their alleged assailants.
All subsequent feminist rape studies have resulted in this discrepancy between the researchers’ conclusions and the subjects’ own views. A survey of sorority girls at the University of Virginia found that only 23 percent of the subjects whom the survey characterized as rape victims felt that they had been raped—a result that the university’s director of Sexual and Domestic Violence Services calls “discouraging.” Equally damning was a 2000 campus rape study conducted under the aegis of the Department of Justice. Sixty-five percent of what the feminist researchers called “completed rape” victims and three-quarters of “attempted rape” victims said that they did not think that their experiences were “serious enough to report.” The “victims” in the study, moreover, “generally did not state that their victimization resulted in physical or emotional injuries,” report the researchers.
The way the "1 in 4" number gets trumpeted, you'd think the Left Wing Media, you know, was in bed with the feminists or something.
Look, rape is about the worst thing that can happen to somebody. It shouldn't be trivialized by conflating it with the drunken hookup culture which pervades campuses, and which is also in large part a product of feminism. Young women get told how empowering sex is, get loaded to get over their inhibitions and do what the feminists tell them to, and wake up to find the experience to be degrading and not wonderful in the least. Awful, but not rape.
Of course, you won't see feminists advising combatting the potential for campus rape by imposing curfews, eliminating coed dorms, and restoring a sense of female propriety.
The problem's not THAT bad, right?
One more thing: if those evil male college students are preying on young feminists to the tune of 25%, wouldn't one expect homosexual rape to be even more prevalent on campus? I mean, the hookup culture is more pronounced among the male gay community, particularly young males, right? That would have to translate into more opportunities for such crimes to be committed, yet I don't see such claims being made outside of penal institutions, where the Left doesn't seem to much care about stopping it.
Curiouser and curiouser, the cracked lens of the modern leftist.
Labels: Politics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home