I Don't Want Your Civil War
Al Qaeda blows it---big time:
There is a tendency in the West to see Muslims as one uniform block. This is not so, as constant Muslim-on-Muslim fighting ought to demonstrate. Moreover, nationalism is not alien to even tribal societies like those of the Middle East. Iraqi Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds understand what Zarqawi is trying to pull. It's too little too late---they're looking to the future, not to past failed jihads.
The destruction of this mosque is not just a strategic blunder---it's the act of a failed guerilla movement and a desperate, last-ditch attempt to foment anarchy in Iraq. It won't work, and Zarqawi has likely sealed his fate. He'll be trying to get to Iran as soon as possible now.
The attack was most probably perpetrated by al Qaeda, which has been trying to foment civil strife in Iraq for some time, and declared open war on the Shiites last year. They have mounted numerous provocative attacks on Shia and Kurdish targets, to no noticeable effect. This strike was much more audacious; the (previously) golden-domed shrine is an ancient and revered structure, and the tombs within are holy both to Shiites and Sunnis, though more so to the former. The initial retaliatory attacks on Sunni mosques must have pleased Zarqawi; if taking down this site did not start the civil war, nothing would.
So the foreign fighters must have been stunned when Shiite and Sunni leaders rushed out statements saying they knew that the takfiri (i.e., those who accuse other Muslims of being infidels, a code word in this context for the foreign extremists) were behind the attack, and they would not let this act of brutality divide Iraq. In an announcement on his website Shiite leader Ayatollah Ali Sistani blamed “takfiris [who] meant to foment sedition among the Iraqi people, thus fulfilling their malicious goals.” He has called for seven days of mourning and peaceful demonstrations in response to the bombing. He added, “we urge everyone not to be dragged into committing acts that would only please the enemies, namely, the sectarian sedition which they have long attempted to push Iraq into its furnace.” Shiite radical Muqtada al-Sadr — remember him? — blamed the attack on the takfiri, Saddam loyalists, and “the occupation.” “We should not attack Sunni mosques,” he said on al Jazeera. “I ordered [his militia the] Al-Mahdi Army to protect the Shiite and Sunni shrines and to show a high sense of responsibility, something they actually did.” (Nice that they followed orders, did this surprise him?)
Sunni groups followed suit. The Association of Muslim Scholars posted a statement condemning this “suspicious criminal act that seeks to stir sedition and unrest” and the “perpetrators and masterminds of this act, who wish to harm Iraq and divide its people for the sake of their personal agendas and the interests and schemes of foreign powers in this ravaged country.” Likewise the National Dialogue Council denounced the attempt to “divide Iraq and light the flame of civil war between its sons,” and the Iraqi Islamic Party called for self restraint, even as its offices were attacked, saying that in a civil war there would be no winner.
There is a tendency in the West to see Muslims as one uniform block. This is not so, as constant Muslim-on-Muslim fighting ought to demonstrate. Moreover, nationalism is not alien to even tribal societies like those of the Middle East. Iraqi Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds understand what Zarqawi is trying to pull. It's too little too late---they're looking to the future, not to past failed jihads.
The destruction of this mosque is not just a strategic blunder---it's the act of a failed guerilla movement and a desperate, last-ditch attempt to foment anarchy in Iraq. It won't work, and Zarqawi has likely sealed his fate. He'll be trying to get to Iran as soon as possible now.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home