The Return of Nazism
It's back, despite the cries of "Never again":
Olmert and Bush's horribly weak performance in Lebanon virtually guarantee that anti-Semitism will explode. And as in the pre-Holocaust days, Americans can't even bring themselves to call the murder of Jews anything but a random act of the mentally ill.
Unfortunately, this particular mental illness is contagious---no, it's positively virulent.
But Jews don't fit politically-correct notions of victims any longer---they're too successful for that, and the Holocaust is now something Steven Spielberg references obliquely while glorifying money-grubbing Nazis.
And why should the Israelis be allowed to fight for their survival when we're not sure Americans should?
The Jews everywhere are “the Muslim’s bitter enemies,” said a prominent Islamic leader. Throughout history, the “irreconcilable enemy of Islam” has conspired and schemed and “oppressed and persecuted 40 million Muslims,” he said. In Palestine, the Jews are establishing “a base from which to extend their power over neighboring Islamic countries.” And, he proclaimed, “This war, which was unleashed by the world Jewry,” has provided “Muslims the best opportunity to free themselves from these instances of persecution and oppression.”
Sound like Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah? Or perhaps Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Nope. It was the grand mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin Husseini, in 1942. An ardent Nazi supporter, Husseini delivered his speech at the opening of the Islamic Institute in Berlin, one day after the Allies denounced the Nazis for “carrying into effect Hitler’s oft-repeated intention to exterminate the Jewish people in Europe.” Husseini’s address was approved by Nazi foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Joseph Goebbels was in attendance. The Reich press office widely distributed the comments.
President Bush undoubtedly didn’t have any of this in mind when he dubbed our enemies in the war on terror “Islamic fascists.” But his comments — analytically flawed as they may be — added some much-needed moral clarity to our current struggle. They also helped to illuminate a much-overlooked point: Islamic fundamentalism and Nazism are historically and intellectually linked. (When the Israelis caught Adolf Eichmann, an architect of the Final Solution, a leading Saudi Arabian newspaper read: “Arrest of Eichmann, who had the honor of killing 6 million Jews.”) Perhaps unsurprisingly, Bush’s remarks seem to have struck a nerve.
The Saudi government warned “against hurling charges of terrorism and fascism at Muslims without regard to the spotless history of Islamic civilization.” Of course, no civilization is without sin, but it takes particular chutzpah for the Saudis to preen, considering their civilization is as spotless as a leopard.
Olmert and Bush's horribly weak performance in Lebanon virtually guarantee that anti-Semitism will explode. And as in the pre-Holocaust days, Americans can't even bring themselves to call the murder of Jews anything but a random act of the mentally ill.
Unfortunately, this particular mental illness is contagious---no, it's positively virulent.
But Jews don't fit politically-correct notions of victims any longer---they're too successful for that, and the Holocaust is now something Steven Spielberg references obliquely while glorifying money-grubbing Nazis.
And why should the Israelis be allowed to fight for their survival when we're not sure Americans should?
1 Comments:
"Look for the silver lining, whenever dark clouds appear in the sky..."
If Bush and Company can muster the wits and cojones to capitalize on her misguided judicial act, it could be Judge Taylor's sorry attack on NSA surveillance gave the GOP a clear and easily argued campaign issue to take into the November election campaigns.
In a similar sense, the recent debacle in Lebanon might serve as a catalyst to reverse the slide into liberal, politically correct agendas that has paralyzed the Israeli response to Hezbollah.
I know, I know. "Hope is not a strategy"...but, hope is better than dispair, and the opportunities are certainly there.
In an earlier comment, I implied, naming Carville, that American political advisers' fingerprints were all over the failures in Israel vs Hezbollah. A little research after the fact revealed that Netanyahu was the first to introduce American political tacticians into Israeli politics, and that Olmert is credited with winning his PM position without American intervention. So, bad on me for a weak opening. The point remains, however, that in 1999, as Clinton was feverishly trying to secure his legacy at the expense of Israeli security, he sent Carville, et al, to Israel to work on behalf of Barak. I would argue the results of that meddling can be seen in Israel today.
Post a Comment
<< Home